Skip to main content

Why meaningless lists are taking over your FYP

tiktok on a phone with comments about random lists

Lists tend to go viral. That fact defined an entire era of the internet.

Lately, though, a bizarre new type of list has been blowing up on TikTok. The best way to describe these lists is incoherent. Here's the formula, obviously generalized:

  • An anonymous account with a username that consists of a mishmash of letters and numbers posts a clip of a TV show, movie, or similar piece of media.

  • During that clip — which is typically longer than a minute — a numbered list is revealed one at a time.

  • The listed text is utter nonsense. At best, it's vaguely related to the clip. Mostly, it's just words or phrases slowly being revealed.

These videos have insidiously wormed their way onto FYPs, in some cases racking up millions of views.

If your brain is half turned off, that TikTok might seem normal. But what does "compromise" or "question" have to do with the dialogue of that scene from This Is Us? These sorts of videos are everywhere, and they're racking up engagement with such stellar insight as, "1) going 2) no 3) have."

People are noticing the weird trend. Go to the comments, and you'll find folks wondering, "What is with the numbered words?" or "What are we ranking here?"

We're ranking nothing. The words mean nothing. People are simple creatures. We love lists. We love rankings. We want to know how the story ends, even if the story sucks or makes zero sense. The incoherent, nonsensical lists are a hook for your attention. It's an incredibly low-effort bait for engagement, and it works, even if it's silly.

If the clip doesn't catch your attention, maybe the unrelated list will. It's also a simple way to alter a video that clearly doesn't belong to the person posting it, perhaps working to hide it from platforms tracking that down.

And would it be surprising if these list-clip enterprises were at least partially AI-created slop? Of course not. It's 2025, and slop always muddies your FYP in one form or another. The latest version just happens to be incoherent lists.



from Mashable https://ift.tt/BiKkatA
via IFTTT

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Instagram accidentally reinstated Pornhub’s banned account

After years of on-and-off temporary suspensions, Instagram permanently banned Pornhub’s account in September. Then, for a short period of time this weekend, the account was reinstated. By Tuesday, it was permanently banned again. “This was done in error,” an Instagram spokesperson told TechCrunch. “As we’ve said previously, we permanently disabled this Instagram account for repeatedly violating our policies.” Instagram’s content guidelines prohibit  nudity and sexual solicitation . A Pornhub spokesperson told TechCrunch, though, that they believe the adult streaming platform’s account did not violate any guidelines. Instagram has not commented on the exact reasoning for the ban, or which policies the account violated. It’s worrying from a moderation perspective if a permanently banned Instagram account can accidentally get switched back on. Pornhub told TechCrunch that its account even received a notice from Instagram, stating that its ban had been a mistake (that message itse...

Watch Aidy Bryant *completely* lose it as 'SNL' roasts political pundits

On Saturday Night Live , there are breaks and then there's whatever happened here. The Season 45 premiere featured a sketch that was meant to expose the empty noisemaking of political punditry on TV. But part of the joke involved a series of quick costume changes, and some weirdness during one of those switches led to a complete and total breakdown. Aidy Bryant, the segment's host, couldn't take it. She manages to keep it together until what appears to be an accidental wide shot exposes some of the magic as we see a woman who's probably a member of the SNL wardrobe crew fiddling with Aidy's costume. Read more... More about Saturday Night Live , Aidy Bryant , Entertainment , and Movies Tv Shows from Mashable https://ift.tt/2okrAOq via IFTTT

California Gov. Newsom vetoes bill SB 1047 that aims to prevent AI disasters

California Gov. Gavin Newsom has vetoed bill SB 1047, which aims to prevent bad actors from using AI to cause "critical harm" to humans. The California state assembly passed the legislation by a margin of 41-9 on August 28, but several organizations including the Chamber of Commerce had urged Newsom to veto the bill . In his veto message on Sept. 29, Newsom said the bill is "well-intentioned" but "does not take into account whether an Al system is deployed in high-risk environments, involves critical decision-making or the use of sensitive data. Instead, the bill applies stringent standards to even the most basic functions - so long as a large system deploys it."  SB 1047 would have made the developers of AI models liable for adopting safety protocols that would stop catastrophic uses of their technology. That includes preventive measures such as testing and outside risk assessment, as well as an "emergency stop" that would completely shut down...