Skip to main content

Vision Pro M5 review roundup: What do the critics say this time?

Woman wearing M5 Apple Vision Pro

In a world where the Samsung Galaxy XR exists, Apple suddenly has some stiff competition in the XR headset space. Is the newly upgraded Vision Pro headset enough of an improvement to justify its still-enormous $3,500 price?

Mashable has not gotten proper hands-on time with the new Vision Pro with the M5 chip and some added comfort features yet (though we have been impressed with the M5 chip so far). But early reviews are rolling in. Without wasting any more time, let's find out if these seemingly modest upgrades are enough to make the Vision Pro less of a niche product two years after its launch.

What do critics have to say about Apple's expensive new headset?

It's got better performance and battery life

First things first, the biggest update to the new Vision Pro is the addition of an M5 chip powering it. This is Apple's latest in-house silicon, and every review I read noted that performance is improved on this new device. There are also a couple of related upgrades, including new 120Hz displays with higher pixel counts (they were 100Hz before) and longer battery life.

That said, the improved performance may not necessarily wow you. CNET's Scott Stein called the improvements "subtle," but the specific ones he mentioned do sound nice, at least.

"Hand tracking in games does feel faster, by a bit. Synth Riders, the closest Vision has to musical fitness, keeps the glowing balls glued to my hands more smoothly," Stein wrote. "Maybe it's that refresh rate. Apps and games load a lot faster, and the headset starts up far quicker. It should, since the M5 is several generations past the previous M2."

As for battery, the previous model was rated for only about two hours of general use. Apple has upped that by half an hour this time, and is also promising three hours of video playback. Mark Spoonauer of Tom's Guide noted that the upgrade is real, but it's still not the most convenient thing to use because of its relatively short battery life.

"After using the Vision Pro for an hour and a half I was down to 55%, which is pretty decent," Spoonauer wrote. "If you’re sitting down and near an outlet, you can keep the battery charged as you work and play, but it’s not fun feeling like you’re tethered."

The new strap provides added comfort

Apple Vision Pro band knob
The new knob for adjusting the new strap. Credit: Apple

Weirdly, the new Vision Pro is actually slightly heavier than its predecessor. That sounds problematic, especially considering weight was a common complaint about the first Vision Pro. Some added context is needed here, though: The new weight comes entirely from a new Dual Knit Band that sits both on the top and around the back of your head for provided comfort and stability during long sessions.

Chance Miller of 9to5Mac talked in their review about how much more comfortable it is to wear than the previous Vision Pro, which had multiple inadequate solutions for this problem. The new band is apparently simple as can be to adjust, as well.

"In practice, the Dual Knit Band is a huge upgrade over the Solo Knit Band and Dual Loop Band. It’s what Apple should’ve shipped from the start," Miller wrote. "It’s more comfortable and plush, it’s more adjustable, it’s easier to put on and take off, and it looks better than the Dual Loop Band. I’ve noticed that the counterweight in particular does a good job of taking pressure off my face when wearing Vision Pro for extended periods of time."

Still, it doesn't seem like Apple has quite perfected the comfort side of Vision Pro just yet. Kyle Barr of Gizmodo wrote that the new band is an upgrade over what came before, but it's still a heavy headset that will require frequent breaks from users.

"There’s no perfect way to alleviate the pressure of such a thick and heavy headset made to rest over your eyes. Even if you can stomach the discomfort, you’ll inevitably need to take the headset off to cure any lingering eyestrain," Barr wrote. "You know what? That’s fine. It’s good to have a reason to take yourself away from the computer and touch grass, or else just get away from every screen constantly demanding your attention. Just remember to take the external battery out of your pocket when you get up, or else your $3,500 headset will go skittering across the ground."

Not much else has changed

Despite the noticeable improvements to performance, battery life, and comfort, basically every review of the Vision Pro M5 comes to the same conclusion: This product is still in its infancy, and for $3,500, it's probably not a necessity for anyone yet.

There are some reasons for this. While Apple has made a couple of other changes with the new device, such as adding support for PlayStation VR2 controllers, there's still a glaring lack of custom, spatialized apps for Vision Pro. At CNET, Stein also wrote that it doesn't always play super nice with other Apple devices. In summary, there's still a lot of work to be done, per Stein.

"The Vision Pro still feels like a first-generation product. Apple needs to figure out how to make future headsets feel lighter, more like glasses," Stein wrote. "It needs to lean on processing and battery from connected Apple products like phones and Macs and iPads. The headset should have all the tools anyone needs to create, share and connect with whatever Apple device they want to use. And its unique app offerings need to be even better, its inputs even more fluid and flexible."

At Tom's Guide, Spoonauer also summed it up nicely. Apple's XR revolution doesn't seem to have a great deal of momentum right now.

"When I reviewed the original Vision Pro, I called it a “revolution in progress.” Well, now I feel like that revolution has stalled," Spoonauer wrote. "Yes, the Vision Pro M5 offers a faster chip and a comfier strap, but I expected much more hardware and software innovation from Apple for what’s supposed to be a category-defining product."



from Mashable https://ift.tt/EZX3nv8
via IFTTT

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Instagram accidentally reinstated Pornhub’s banned account

After years of on-and-off temporary suspensions, Instagram permanently banned Pornhub’s account in September. Then, for a short period of time this weekend, the account was reinstated. By Tuesday, it was permanently banned again. “This was done in error,” an Instagram spokesperson told TechCrunch. “As we’ve said previously, we permanently disabled this Instagram account for repeatedly violating our policies.” Instagram’s content guidelines prohibit  nudity and sexual solicitation . A Pornhub spokesperson told TechCrunch, though, that they believe the adult streaming platform’s account did not violate any guidelines. Instagram has not commented on the exact reasoning for the ban, or which policies the account violated. It’s worrying from a moderation perspective if a permanently banned Instagram account can accidentally get switched back on. Pornhub told TechCrunch that its account even received a notice from Instagram, stating that its ban had been a mistake (that message itse...

Watch Aidy Bryant *completely* lose it as 'SNL' roasts political pundits

On Saturday Night Live , there are breaks and then there's whatever happened here. The Season 45 premiere featured a sketch that was meant to expose the empty noisemaking of political punditry on TV. But part of the joke involved a series of quick costume changes, and some weirdness during one of those switches led to a complete and total breakdown. Aidy Bryant, the segment's host, couldn't take it. She manages to keep it together until what appears to be an accidental wide shot exposes some of the magic as we see a woman who's probably a member of the SNL wardrobe crew fiddling with Aidy's costume. Read more... More about Saturday Night Live , Aidy Bryant , Entertainment , and Movies Tv Shows from Mashable https://ift.tt/2okrAOq via IFTTT

California Gov. Newsom vetoes bill SB 1047 that aims to prevent AI disasters

California Gov. Gavin Newsom has vetoed bill SB 1047, which aims to prevent bad actors from using AI to cause "critical harm" to humans. The California state assembly passed the legislation by a margin of 41-9 on August 28, but several organizations including the Chamber of Commerce had urged Newsom to veto the bill . In his veto message on Sept. 29, Newsom said the bill is "well-intentioned" but "does not take into account whether an Al system is deployed in high-risk environments, involves critical decision-making or the use of sensitive data. Instead, the bill applies stringent standards to even the most basic functions - so long as a large system deploys it."  SB 1047 would have made the developers of AI models liable for adopting safety protocols that would stop catastrophic uses of their technology. That includes preventive measures such as testing and outside risk assessment, as well as an "emergency stop" that would completely shut down...