Skip to main content

6 'facts' about human evolution that are wrong

Original letters from Charles Darwin on display at the Herbaruim library.
A scientific theory is an explanation of facts based on robust research that's been replicated numerous times.
  • Modern humans did not evolve from monkeys or any other animal that lives today.
  • Humans continue to evolve but the traits we pass down aren't always for the species' betterment. 
  • "Survival of the fittest" probably doesn't mean what you think and has nothing to do with strength. 
Human evolution is complex. Misconceptions, misunderstandings, and myths readily arise when we try to simplify it too much.
Biology teacher teaches in a classroom.
America has struggled to get schools nationwide to teach human evolution as fact.

The overwhelming majority of scientists agree that humans evolved over time, yet misconceptions about human evolution persist in American society for a few reasons.

One reason is that evolution is complex, and easily drawn conclusions aren't always entirely accurate. In the past, politicians have misled the public about evolution in an effort to ban teaching the concept in public schools.

Accepting evolution is key to understanding the natural world and our place in it as humans, said Bridget Alex, a lecturer in human evolutionary biology at Harvard University and an editor for "SAPIENS" magazine.

But not everything you hear about evolution in soundbites or headlines is true.

Myth: Humans descended from monkeys
Conceptual X-ray image of human evolution.
Simplistic depictions of human evolution can easily lead to common misconceptions about where we actually came from.

Monkeys and humans share a common ancestor that lived about 60 million years ago, but humans did not descend from the monkeys we see today.

In fact, humans are actually more closely related to chimpanzees than monkeys, but we didn't evolve from chimpanzees, either.

The common ancestor we shared with monkeys diverged into separate lineages that eventually became the monkeys, chimpanzees, and humans we recognize today.

"It's the same way you maybe have siblings, and you descended from common parents, or you maybe have cousins, and you descended from common grandparents," Alex said. "That is, if we keep extending that and go back in time, say, 7 [million] or 8 million years, you'll find that you have the same ancestors as current living chimpanzees have."

Myth: "Survival of the fittest" means only the strongest survive
Primary school students salute during the national flag raising ceremony in Yantai, East China's Shandong Province.
Students in East China are shown here saluting the country during a national flag-raising ceremony.

Fitness is often associated with how physically strong and healthy someone is. But in evolutionary terms, fitness means the likelihood of passing on traits to offspring who are then likely to survive and have offspring of their own.

For example, if you compare someone who rarely exercises and eats a poor diet with someone who eats a well-rounded diet and runs marathons, you might say the runner is more "fit."

But if the person with unhealthy habits has 10 grandchildren and the other person has none, then the unhealthy person has higher evolutionary fitness than the person with a healthier lifestyle.

"It's not about how fast you can run or how much you can bench-press," Alex said. "Evolutionary fitness only cares about reproductive success."

Myth: Evolution always leads to progress
Cyril Ramaphosa and Professor Lee Berger at the reveal of the discovery of a new species of human relative.
Modern humans aren't necessarily the best version of hominids to ever exist. The ancient human relative shown here, called Homo naledi, had a smaller brain and unusually curved fingers.

Traits passed down through generations aren't necessarily the best traits that contribute to a more advanced, improved species. Traits are passed down from individuals who were simply "good enough" within their environment to reproduce.

For example, fossils show human ancestors had much larger teeth than humans do today, likely due to changes in diet over the last 2 million years.

The size of human teeth today is not necessarily better or worse, but simply more suited to the current environment.

"Evolution cares about reproductive success, having offspring that survive and have their own offspring, passing on particular genes or traits, generation after generation," Alex said. "So if [evolution] doesn't go in a certain direction, it just responds to the local and current conditions."

Myth: Humans have stopped evolving
An old sherpa woman in front of her house at Namche Bazar in Lukla, Nepal.
People who live in high altitudes, like this Nepalese woman, have evolved to have fewer red blood cells.

Advancements in technology and medicine have allowed humans to modify our environments and live longer, and that doesn't mean we have stopped evolving.

"As long as our species continues having offspring, we're going to continue to evolve," Alex said.

One example involves groups of people known as Tibetan highlanders and Nepalese Sherpa who live at high altitudes.

Oxygen levels are lower at higher altitudes, making it difficult for people accustomed to lower altitudes to get enough oxygen to their cells, which can affect breathing and cognition.

But over thousands of years, Tibetan highlanders have evolved to thrive in a low-oxygen environment by evolving to produce fewer red blood cells.

Red blood cells help carry oxygen throughout the body, but too many thicken the blood and, like a traffic jam, slow down the process. With fewer red blood cells, that highway opens up and can quickly carry oxygen throughout the body with ease.

Myth: Humans cannot harm ecosystems because organisms will just adapt
A Thai elephant walks in the jungle
Large mammals like elephants are at risk of eventually going extinct as their natural resources continue to decline due to climate change and other human interference.

It is true that organisms will continue to adapt to their environment no matter what humans do to the planet. But humans can and do have a negative impact on ecosystems, changing the world as know it.

"The harsh reality is that many of the animals, plants, and other organisms we know today are not going to survive the next century," Alex said. "Some of the big creatures we've been used to, like giraffes or elephants, their time on earth is probably limited because of human activities."

Climate change is perhaps the most obvious example of how humans can negatively impact ecosystems. Because of human activity that has contributed to climate change, warming temperatures are disrupting giraffe habitats and making food scarce.

Moreover, droughts brought on by climate change are also a threat to large mammals, like elephants and hippos, who rely on natural sources of water for drinking, bathing, and cooling off.

Myth: Human evolution is a theory, not a fact
Original letters from Charles Darwin on display at the Herbaruim library.
A scientific theory is an explanation of facts based on robust research that's been replicated numerous times.

This misconception comes down to a disconnect between how the general public uses the words "theory" and "fact" and how scientists use them.

People outside of the scientific community often use the word "theory" to describe an educated guess, hunch, or assumption about something unproven. This line of thinking also assumes a theory can become a fact when tested and proven.

But from a scientific perspective, that's not how theories and facts work. It's true that a fact is an indisputable observation that has been repeatedly confirmed, like that the sun is a star or that the human skeleton is made up of 206 bones.

But theories aren't guesses waiting to be tested. In scientific terms, a theory is an explanation of facts based on robust research.

The theory of evolution explains how organisms change and adapt to their environments. Other scientific theories include the theory of gravity, which explains why objects fall to the ground, and cell theory, which explains how cells make up all living organisms.

"In order for something to be a theory in science, it has overwhelming scientific evidence, usually from decades (if not centuries) of research and experiments," Alex said. "So if you agree with the theory of gravity, you should also agree with the overwhelming scientific evidence that supports the theory of evolution."

Read the original article on Business Insider


from Business Insider https://ift.tt/dVYW5Ok
via IFTTT

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Instagram accidentally reinstated Pornhub’s banned account

After years of on-and-off temporary suspensions, Instagram permanently banned Pornhub’s account in September. Then, for a short period of time this weekend, the account was reinstated. By Tuesday, it was permanently banned again. “This was done in error,” an Instagram spokesperson told TechCrunch. “As we’ve said previously, we permanently disabled this Instagram account for repeatedly violating our policies.” Instagram’s content guidelines prohibit  nudity and sexual solicitation . A Pornhub spokesperson told TechCrunch, though, that they believe the adult streaming platform’s account did not violate any guidelines. Instagram has not commented on the exact reasoning for the ban, or which policies the account violated. It’s worrying from a moderation perspective if a permanently banned Instagram account can accidentally get switched back on. Pornhub told TechCrunch that its account even received a notice from Instagram, stating that its ban had been a mistake (that message itself w

Colorado police identified the serial killer who murdered 4 women 40 years ago after exhuming his body to analyze a DNA sample

A scientist examines computer images of DNA models. Getty Images Police in Colorado have cracked the cold cases of four women killed 40 years ago. Denver PD said genetic genealogy and DNA analysis helped them identify the serial killer. He had died by suicide in jail in 1981. DNA from his exhumed body matched evidence from the murders. Police in Colorado have cracked the code on four murder cases that went unsolved for 40 years, using DNA from the killer's exhumed body. The cases pertain to four women killed in the Denver metro area between 1978 and 1981. They were 33-year-old Madeleine Furey-Livaudais, 53-year-old Dolores Barajas, 27-year-old Gwendolyn Harris, and 17-year-old Antoinette Parks. The four women were stabbed to death. Denver Police Commander Matt Clark said in a press conference Friday that there was an "underlying sexual component" to the murders but didn't elaborate further. In 2009, a detective reviewed Parks' case and picked several p

Axeleo Capital raises $51 million fund

Axeleo Capital has raised a $51 million fund (€45 million). Axeleo first started with an accelerator focused on enterprise startups. The firm is now all grown up with an acceleration program and a full-fledged VC fund. The accelerator is now called Axeleo Scale , while the fund is called Axeleo Capital . And it’s important to mention both parts of the business as they work hand in hand. Axeleo picks up around 10 startups per year and help them reach the Series A stage. If they’re doing well over the 12 to 18 months of the program, Axeleo funds those startups using its VC fund. Limited partners behind the company’s first fund include Bpifrance through the French Tech Accélération program, the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes region, Vinci Energies, Crédit Agricole, BNP Paribas, Caisse d’Épargne Rhône-Alpes as well as various business angels and family offices. The firm is also partnering with Hi Inov, the holding company of the Dentressangle family. Axeleo will take care of the early stage in