Skip to main content

Twitter wants a federal court to throw out employees' collective allegations over layoffs

Elon Musk's Twitter account displayed on a mobile with Elon Musk in the background are seen in this illustration. In Brussels - Belgium on 19 November 2022. (Photo illustration by Jonathan Raa/NurPhoto via Getty Images)
Twitter logo displayed on a cellphone with Elon Musk and the Twitter bird in the background.
  • Twitter is fighting a lawsuit by a group of employees whose layoffs take effect in the new year.
  • The employees, part of mass layoffs since Elon Musk took over, want more than a month's severance.
  • Twitter's lawyers argue that many employees received the legally required notice before layoffs.

Twitter is asking a California federal court to throw out a proposed class action suit by a group of employees suing over "mass layoffs" at the social media platform since Elon Musk took over.

On Friday, Twitter asked the court to either transfer the allegations to Delaware — where disputes over Twitter's acquisition by Musk are to take place under the terms of the deal — or to dismiss potential class allegations in the suit. 

Twitter has argued that the employees who brought the lawsuit themselves have different circumstances, and that they haven't properly stated what broad claims a large potential class of Twitter employees would have.

One of the employees in the group which filed the suit was already laid off, while the others' official end dates at Twitter are in January and February 2023, according to an updated version of the employees' complaint filed earlier this month. 

Twitter's lawyers argued that the employees had made "vague, imprecise" claims about a collective group of Twitter employees' they're hoping to represent, and asked the court to dismiss their effort to bring claims covering such a large base of employees. 

"Plaintiffs do not even attempt to define a class, making only passing reference to 'thousands of other Twitter employees,' or 'other similarly situated Twitter employees,'" Twitter argued in a court filing on Dec. 23. 

An attorney for the employees, Shannon Liss-Riordan, told Insider Sunday night that she and the employees she represents are "confident in our claims." 

"We will do everything necessary to protect the rights of Twitter employees," Liss-Riordan said.

"We call on Elon Musk to show some holiday spirit and honor the law and promises made to Twitter employees," she added. "If not, we are ready to take him on in 2023."

Twitter's attorneys did not immediately respond to Insider's request for comment on Sunday night. 

The lawsuit was filed by a group of Twitter employees who are arguing that the layoffs happened so unexpectedly, and offered so little severance, that it went against assurances they'd been given by the company's previous leadership before Musk's purchase became official. 

The employees claimed they'd expected, for instance, that they could keep working remotely for a year after the takeover, but Musk instructed employees to return to the office. They alleged also that many of them are being offered just one month's severance pay, instead of two months or more, as they said Twitter had typically done before Musk's takeover. 

Twitter's lawyers told the court that the employees who brought the lawsuit have varying issues, and should be dealt with differently. Only one of them, for instance, has already been pushed out — Emmanuel Cornet, who alleged he was laid off on Nov. 1 without any notice. 

The other employees, who are only officially being let go over the next two months, have received the requisite 60 days notice under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, a federal law that asks large companies to properly alert staff to mass layoffs, Twitter has told the court. 

Twitter has also argued that some of the employees in this group are bound by arbitration and that that's where their claims should play out.

Read the original article on Business Insider


from Business Insider https://ift.tt/8d4iTrP
via IFTTT

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Instagram accidentally reinstated Pornhub’s banned account

After years of on-and-off temporary suspensions, Instagram permanently banned Pornhub’s account in September. Then, for a short period of time this weekend, the account was reinstated. By Tuesday, it was permanently banned again. “This was done in error,” an Instagram spokesperson told TechCrunch. “As we’ve said previously, we permanently disabled this Instagram account for repeatedly violating our policies.” Instagram’s content guidelines prohibit  nudity and sexual solicitation . A Pornhub spokesperson told TechCrunch, though, that they believe the adult streaming platform’s account did not violate any guidelines. Instagram has not commented on the exact reasoning for the ban, or which policies the account violated. It’s worrying from a moderation perspective if a permanently banned Instagram account can accidentally get switched back on. Pornhub told TechCrunch that its account even received a notice from Instagram, stating that its ban had been a mistake (that message itse...

If only your bike had a trunk. Oh wait, now it does.

Just to let you know, if you buy something featured here, Mashable might earn an affiliate commission. Biking is one of the best ways to get around, especially if you live in a city. It's quick, it's eco-friendly, and you get a bit of exercise.  If you already commute on two wheels or are thinking of starting, there's a storage device you kinda need. SEE ALSO: This bamboo keyboard combo adds a touch of tranquility to your workspace The Buca Boot is a pretty magical two-in-one hybrid: It’s a super secure storage box for your bike that works like the trunk of a car. You can lock your helmet or whatever else in it and leave it safely behind. It’s also a basket—open it up, and you can carry a bouquet of flowers and a baguette like the picturesque cyclist of your dreams.    Read more... More about Storage , Car , Bicycle , Trunk , and Cyclist from Mashable http://ift.tt/2eHNwLB via IFTTT

California Gov. Newsom vetoes bill SB 1047 that aims to prevent AI disasters

California Gov. Gavin Newsom has vetoed bill SB 1047, which aims to prevent bad actors from using AI to cause "critical harm" to humans. The California state assembly passed the legislation by a margin of 41-9 on August 28, but several organizations including the Chamber of Commerce had urged Newsom to veto the bill . In his veto message on Sept. 29, Newsom said the bill is "well-intentioned" but "does not take into account whether an Al system is deployed in high-risk environments, involves critical decision-making or the use of sensitive data. Instead, the bill applies stringent standards to even the most basic functions - so long as a large system deploys it."  SB 1047 would have made the developers of AI models liable for adopting safety protocols that would stop catastrophic uses of their technology. That includes preventive measures such as testing and outside risk assessment, as well as an "emergency stop" that would completely shut down...