Skip to main content

Sen. Amy Klobuchar said she does not trust Elon Musk running Twitter, lambastes social-media companies for 'making money off' violence

Sen. Amy Klobuchar and Elon Musk.
Sen. Amy Klobuchar and Elon Musk.
  • Sen. Amy Klobuchar said she does not trust Elon Musk as the new owner of Twitter.
  • She called for greater content moderation on social media, where conspiracy theories run rampant.
  • Musk has said he is a "free-speech absolutionist" who wants Twitter to be a "digital town square." 

Sen. Amy Klobuchar on Sunday said she doesn't trust Elon Musk as the new owner of Twitter, noting that social-media companies have profited from misinformation, disinformation, and political-conspiracy campaigns. 

The Minnesota Democrat called for stronger content moderation on social-media sites while on "Meet the Press" on NBC News on Sunday morning when host Chuck Todd asked if she trusts Musk. 

"No, I do not," Klobuchar replied before rebuking social-media companies for "making money" off of amplifying "stuff that's a bunch of lies."

Musk, a self-proclaimed "free-speech absolutionist" who has said he wants Twitter to be a "digital town square," has previously criticized content moderation, Insider's Travis Clark previously reported

Musk said Friday that the company plans to form a content-moderation council, adding that "no major content decisions" would happen before that. 

 

"Elon Musk has said now that he's going to start a content-moderation board. That was one good sign. But I continue to be concerned about that. I just don't think people should be making money off of passing on this stuff that's a bunch of lies," Klobuchar said on Sunday. "You couldn't do that on your network, Chuck."

Todd replied that NBC has "real rules." News organizations are tasked with fact-checking and verifying the information they share, a basic tenet of journalism.

"That is not a requirement of these companies. And we have to change the requirements on these companies. They are making money off of us. They are making money off of this violence," Klobuchar said. "I think that it's one thing if someone is posting stuff on the internet, it is another when they're making money amplifying it."

Klobuchar added that social-media companies bear some responsibility in staving off political violence, referencing the attack on Paul Pelosi on Friday. A 42-year-old man who broke into Pelosi's San Francisco home searching for the House Speaker hit her husband with a hammer. 

Los Angeles Times report found that the suspect in the assault, David DePape, previously spread right-wing QAnon conspiracy theories, antisemitism, and bigotry on social media. 

"When you look at what this guy was looking at, he was looking at just horrendous things you don't even want to talk about on your show. He was posting antisemitic tropes. He was showing memes that showed violence and all of this election-denying, pro-Trump, MAGA-crowd rhetoric. That's what we're dealing with here," Klobuchar said on Sunday. 

Klobuchar listed her four priorities in the aftermath of the assault, including prosecuting "this perpetrator who committed a violent, violent crime" and adding more security for elected officials.

"Number three is to make sure we're not electing more election deniers who are following Donald Trump down this road. And then number four, yes, once we get some people in who care about our democracy, we have to do something about this amplification of this election-denying hate speech that we see on the internet," Klobuchar said. 

She also said she would "reduce their Section 230 immunity" — a section of federal law that reduces liability for illegal things that people say on social media platforms — to "allow people to go after them when they are making money off of amplifying election falsehoods and hate speech." 

Read the original article on Business Insider


from Business Insider https://ift.tt/zSUhNbR
via IFTTT

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Instagram accidentally reinstated Pornhub’s banned account

After years of on-and-off temporary suspensions, Instagram permanently banned Pornhub’s account in September. Then, for a short period of time this weekend, the account was reinstated. By Tuesday, it was permanently banned again. “This was done in error,” an Instagram spokesperson told TechCrunch. “As we’ve said previously, we permanently disabled this Instagram account for repeatedly violating our policies.” Instagram’s content guidelines prohibit  nudity and sexual solicitation . A Pornhub spokesperson told TechCrunch, though, that they believe the adult streaming platform’s account did not violate any guidelines. Instagram has not commented on the exact reasoning for the ban, or which policies the account violated. It’s worrying from a moderation perspective if a permanently banned Instagram account can accidentally get switched back on. Pornhub told TechCrunch that its account even received a notice from Instagram, stating that its ban had been a mistake (that message itse...

Watch Aidy Bryant *completely* lose it as 'SNL' roasts political pundits

On Saturday Night Live , there are breaks and then there's whatever happened here. The Season 45 premiere featured a sketch that was meant to expose the empty noisemaking of political punditry on TV. But part of the joke involved a series of quick costume changes, and some weirdness during one of those switches led to a complete and total breakdown. Aidy Bryant, the segment's host, couldn't take it. She manages to keep it together until what appears to be an accidental wide shot exposes some of the magic as we see a woman who's probably a member of the SNL wardrobe crew fiddling with Aidy's costume. Read more... More about Saturday Night Live , Aidy Bryant , Entertainment , and Movies Tv Shows from Mashable https://ift.tt/2okrAOq via IFTTT

MVP versus EVP: Is it time to introduce ethics into the agile startup model?

Anand Rao Contributor Share on Twitter Anand Rao is global head of AI at PwC . The rocket ship trajectory of a startup is well known: Get an idea, build a team and slap together a minimum viable product (MVP) that you can get in front of users. However, today’s startups need to reconsider the MVP model as artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) become ubiquitous in tech products and the market grows increasingly conscious of the ethical implications of AI augmenting or replacing humans in the decision-making process. An MVP allows you to collect critical feedback from your target market that then informs the minimum development required to launch a product — creating a powerful feedback loop that drives today’s customer-led business. This lean, agile model has been extremely successful over the past two decades — launching thousands of successful startups, some of which have grown into billion-dollar companies. However, building high-performing product...