Skip to main content

Hotels.com will pay you $15,000 to visit the most popular 'retro beach motels' around the country

The Pearl Hotel in San Diego
  • Hotels.com is giving one person $15,000 to travel to beach motels across the country. 
  • The winner will be provided with a Polaroid camera and other vintage giveaways to document their trip.
  • Hotels.com's ranking of the top 10 retro beach motels make up the travel itinerary. 

A new Hotels.com contest is offering the chance to get paid to travel to beaches across the US.

The prize package for the "Retro Beach Motelier" includes $10,000 for transportation to the "10 best retro beach motels" and $5,000 for spending during the trip, according to the contest's website.

The winner will also receive vintage beach gear including a solar-powered AM/FM radio, striped umbrellas, and a retro Polaroid camera to document the trip "for future generations."

To enter, hopefuls must fill out a brief questionnaire by midnight on August 5. In addition to basic information like name, email, and Instagram handle, the application also includes questions like "If you time traveled to the '50s, who would you spend your beach vacation with? "

Applicants must be at least 21-years-old to be eligible for entry, and winners will be selected on August 12.

Exterior of the Vagabond Hotel in Miami.
Vagabond Hotel

Included in the 10 boutique beach motels on the itinerary are Miami's Vagabond Hotel and San Diego's The Pearl Hotel, as well as other venues featured on Hotels.com's ranking of the best retro beach motels.

Hotels.com spokesperson Melissa Dohmen said in a press statement that the contest was designed to "prove that beach motels can be just as luxurious" as upscale, all-inclusive resorts. 

"These timeless motels are not only budget-friendly but will transport beachgoers — literally and figuratively — back in time to truly disconnect and relax," Dohmen said in the statement. 

Read the original article on Business Insider


from Business Insider https://ift.tt/clhRMwz
via IFTTT

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Instagram accidentally reinstated Pornhub’s banned account

After years of on-and-off temporary suspensions, Instagram permanently banned Pornhub’s account in September. Then, for a short period of time this weekend, the account was reinstated. By Tuesday, it was permanently banned again. “This was done in error,” an Instagram spokesperson told TechCrunch. “As we’ve said previously, we permanently disabled this Instagram account for repeatedly violating our policies.” Instagram’s content guidelines prohibit  nudity and sexual solicitation . A Pornhub spokesperson told TechCrunch, though, that they believe the adult streaming platform’s account did not violate any guidelines. Instagram has not commented on the exact reasoning for the ban, or which policies the account violated. It’s worrying from a moderation perspective if a permanently banned Instagram account can accidentally get switched back on. Pornhub told TechCrunch that its account even received a notice from Instagram, stating that its ban had been a mistake (that message itse...

Watch Aidy Bryant *completely* lose it as 'SNL' roasts political pundits

On Saturday Night Live , there are breaks and then there's whatever happened here. The Season 45 premiere featured a sketch that was meant to expose the empty noisemaking of political punditry on TV. But part of the joke involved a series of quick costume changes, and some weirdness during one of those switches led to a complete and total breakdown. Aidy Bryant, the segment's host, couldn't take it. She manages to keep it together until what appears to be an accidental wide shot exposes some of the magic as we see a woman who's probably a member of the SNL wardrobe crew fiddling with Aidy's costume. Read more... More about Saturday Night Live , Aidy Bryant , Entertainment , and Movies Tv Shows from Mashable https://ift.tt/2okrAOq via IFTTT

California Gov. Newsom vetoes bill SB 1047 that aims to prevent AI disasters

California Gov. Gavin Newsom has vetoed bill SB 1047, which aims to prevent bad actors from using AI to cause "critical harm" to humans. The California state assembly passed the legislation by a margin of 41-9 on August 28, but several organizations including the Chamber of Commerce had urged Newsom to veto the bill . In his veto message on Sept. 29, Newsom said the bill is "well-intentioned" but "does not take into account whether an Al system is deployed in high-risk environments, involves critical decision-making or the use of sensitive data. Instead, the bill applies stringent standards to even the most basic functions - so long as a large system deploys it."  SB 1047 would have made the developers of AI models liable for adopting safety protocols that would stop catastrophic uses of their technology. That includes preventive measures such as testing and outside risk assessment, as well as an "emergency stop" that would completely shut down...