Skip to main content

Kansas voters will be the first to directly weigh in on abortion rights in the post-Roe era

Abortion-rights advocates gather outside a the Kansas Statehouse to protest the Supreme Court's ruling on abortion Friday, June 24, 2022, in Topeka, Kan
Abortion-rights advocates gather outside a the Kansas Statehouse to protest the Supreme Court's ruling on abortion Friday, June 24, 2022, in Topeka, Kansas.
  • Kansas voters will be the first to directly weigh in on abortion with an August 2 amendment. 
  • The amendment would establish no right to abortion under the state constitution. 
  • The amendment could hold major consequences for abortion care in the state and the region.

The Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade sends the question of abortion back to the states. The first direct electoral test of abortion rights in the post-Roe era will take place in Kansas.

Direct referendums and amendments on abortion access will be on the ballot in five states this year — and Kansas is up on August 2 with a constitutional amendment on its primary ballot that would establish no right to abortion under the state constitution. 

The measure, Amendment 2, would reverse a 2019 decision by the state Supreme Court establishing a right to abortion in the Kansas Bill of Rights, representing yet another flashpoint in a years-long battle between conservative groups and the state supreme court. 

The specific language of the amendment states: "Because Kansans value both women and children, the constitution of the state of Kansas does not require government funding of abortion and does not create or secure a right to abortion." 

The Kansas amendment passing would have immediate and wide-ranging impacts for the future of abortion access in the state and the broader region, which could be compounded by the outcome of November's elections. 

Vulnerable Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly, elected in 2018, is up for reelection in what could be one of the most competitive governor's races in the country against current Attorney General Derek Schmidt, who reacted approvingly to the Dobbs ruling but has otherwise been vague on what abortion restrictions he would support.

Schmidt running for governor has set up an open race for attorney general, the office that would be tasked with interpreting and enforcing potential future abortion bans. 

Kansas borders two states that have already banned abortion with trigger laws, Missouri and Oklahoma, and is emerging as a crucial access point for abortion care in the Midwest.

 

Even before the Dobbs decision, patients in other states hostile to abortion sought care in Kansas, with the increase in abortions between 2019 and 2020 largely driven by patients coming from Oklahoma and Texas, the Kansas Reflector reported.

The main group behind Amendment 2, Value Them Both, stated after the Supreme Court's ruling in Dobbs that the amendment would "ensure Kansas does not remain a permanent destination for the most extreme and painful abortion procedures."

Already, 0ne major hospital system in Missouri stopped providing Plan B emergency contraception to patients our of fear that staff could be prosecuted under that state's abortion ban before changing course and resuming coverage, a sign of the confusion playing out in states that have banned banned abortion. 

Kansas could also pose an early test of the potency of ballot measures to shape abortion policy at the state level, and the continued appetite among voters to directly restrict access to the procedure with their votes.

Voters have voted on 48 ballot measures related to abortion since the Roe v. Wade decision in 1973, according to Ballotpedia, with the vast majority of those measures put on the ballot by groups that oppose abortion, like in Kansas. 

Four other states -- Alabama, Louisiana, Tennessee, and West Virginia -- have also passed constitutional amendments establishing no right to abortion under their constitutions.

Kentucky, which has already banned abortion with a trigger law, will also vote on a similar constitutional amendment in November. 

 

Read the original article on Business Insider


from Business Insider https://ift.tt/QftG920
via IFTTT

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Instagram accidentally reinstated Pornhub’s banned account

After years of on-and-off temporary suspensions, Instagram permanently banned Pornhub’s account in September. Then, for a short period of time this weekend, the account was reinstated. By Tuesday, it was permanently banned again. “This was done in error,” an Instagram spokesperson told TechCrunch. “As we’ve said previously, we permanently disabled this Instagram account for repeatedly violating our policies.” Instagram’s content guidelines prohibit  nudity and sexual solicitation . A Pornhub spokesperson told TechCrunch, though, that they believe the adult streaming platform’s account did not violate any guidelines. Instagram has not commented on the exact reasoning for the ban, or which policies the account violated. It’s worrying from a moderation perspective if a permanently banned Instagram account can accidentally get switched back on. Pornhub told TechCrunch that its account even received a notice from Instagram, stating that its ban had been a mistake (that message itse...

Watch Aidy Bryant *completely* lose it as 'SNL' roasts political pundits

On Saturday Night Live , there are breaks and then there's whatever happened here. The Season 45 premiere featured a sketch that was meant to expose the empty noisemaking of political punditry on TV. But part of the joke involved a series of quick costume changes, and some weirdness during one of those switches led to a complete and total breakdown. Aidy Bryant, the segment's host, couldn't take it. She manages to keep it together until what appears to be an accidental wide shot exposes some of the magic as we see a woman who's probably a member of the SNL wardrobe crew fiddling with Aidy's costume. Read more... More about Saturday Night Live , Aidy Bryant , Entertainment , and Movies Tv Shows from Mashable https://ift.tt/2okrAOq via IFTTT

California Gov. Newsom vetoes bill SB 1047 that aims to prevent AI disasters

California Gov. Gavin Newsom has vetoed bill SB 1047, which aims to prevent bad actors from using AI to cause "critical harm" to humans. The California state assembly passed the legislation by a margin of 41-9 on August 28, but several organizations including the Chamber of Commerce had urged Newsom to veto the bill . In his veto message on Sept. 29, Newsom said the bill is "well-intentioned" but "does not take into account whether an Al system is deployed in high-risk environments, involves critical decision-making or the use of sensitive data. Instead, the bill applies stringent standards to even the most basic functions - so long as a large system deploys it."  SB 1047 would have made the developers of AI models liable for adopting safety protocols that would stop catastrophic uses of their technology. That includes preventive measures such as testing and outside risk assessment, as well as an "emergency stop" that would completely shut down...