Skip to main content

Justice Alito says the Supreme Court didn't nullify Roe v. Wade in Texas abortion decision: 'This portrayal feeds unprecedented efforts to intimidate the court'

Justice Samuel Alito
Associate Justice Samuel Alito sits during a group photo of the Justices at the Supreme Court in Washington, DC on April 23, 2021.
  • Justice Samuel Alito defended the Supreme Court against recent criticisms.
  • Alito said members of the media and politicians have tried to paint the court's work as "sneaky and dangerous."
  • "This portrayal feeds unprecedented efforts to intimidate the court," he said.
  • See more stories on Insider's business page.

Justice Samuel Alito on Thursday defended the Supreme Court against recent backlash over its decision earlier this month to maintain a Texas law that bans abortion after six weeks of pregnancy.

Alito was among the majority of justices who on September 2 refused an emergency request to block the Texas statute, which is widely considered to be one of the most restrictive abortion measures in the country. The narrow 5-4 decision was handed down on its emergency docket without a full briefing and oral arguments, a process that some experts have called the "shadow docket."

Alito criticized the "shadow docket" term and said members of the media and politicians who've used the phrase are painting Supreme Court procedure as "sneaky and dangerous" and "sinister."

"The truth is there was nothing new or shadowy about the procedures we followed," the associate justice told an audience at the University of Notre Dame.

He added that "this portrayal feeds unprecedented efforts to intimidate the court or damage it as an independent institution."

Alito's remarks come a day after the Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing to examine the court's use of the "shadow docket" and the Texas abortion decision. Democrats attacked the court's conduct, whereas Republicans came to its defense.

Pro-abortion groups, Democratic leaders, and other critics have slammed the court's Texas decision, saying it violated the 1973 landmark ruling Roe v. Wade, which guaranteed the constitutional right to an abortion until about 24 weeks of pregnancy.

During his hour-long lecture on Thursday, Alito rejected such criticisms as "false and inflammatory."

"We did no such thing and we said that expressly in our order," he said.

In an unsigned opinion, the court's majority said the Texas decision was technical and not based on the substance of the law, which could still be legally challenged. The court in December will hear a major abortion case concerning a Mississippi law that bans the procedure after 15 weeks of pregnancy.

Alito's comments echo recent remarks made by his fellow justices Stephen Breyer, Amy Coney Barrett, and Clarence Thomas, who have all defended the court against negative perceptions. The court currently faces low public approval ratings, according to multiple polls.

In a question-and-answer portion at the end of his remarks, Alito pushed back on views that the court behaves like a "policy-making body," saying that justices have different "judicial philosophies" and don't make decisions based on "what we personally would favor."

Read the original article on Business Insider


from Business Insider https://ift.tt/3ojeFt3
via IFTTT

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Instagram accidentally reinstated Pornhub’s banned account

After years of on-and-off temporary suspensions, Instagram permanently banned Pornhub’s account in September. Then, for a short period of time this weekend, the account was reinstated. By Tuesday, it was permanently banned again. “This was done in error,” an Instagram spokesperson told TechCrunch. “As we’ve said previously, we permanently disabled this Instagram account for repeatedly violating our policies.” Instagram’s content guidelines prohibit  nudity and sexual solicitation . A Pornhub spokesperson told TechCrunch, though, that they believe the adult streaming platform’s account did not violate any guidelines. Instagram has not commented on the exact reasoning for the ban, or which policies the account violated. It’s worrying from a moderation perspective if a permanently banned Instagram account can accidentally get switched back on. Pornhub told TechCrunch that its account even received a notice from Instagram, stating that its ban had been a mistake (that message itse...

If only your bike had a trunk. Oh wait, now it does.

Just to let you know, if you buy something featured here, Mashable might earn an affiliate commission. Biking is one of the best ways to get around, especially if you live in a city. It's quick, it's eco-friendly, and you get a bit of exercise.  If you already commute on two wheels or are thinking of starting, there's a storage device you kinda need. SEE ALSO: This bamboo keyboard combo adds a touch of tranquility to your workspace The Buca Boot is a pretty magical two-in-one hybrid: It’s a super secure storage box for your bike that works like the trunk of a car. You can lock your helmet or whatever else in it and leave it safely behind. It’s also a basket—open it up, and you can carry a bouquet of flowers and a baguette like the picturesque cyclist of your dreams.    Read more... More about Storage , Car , Bicycle , Trunk , and Cyclist from Mashable http://ift.tt/2eHNwLB via IFTTT

California Gov. Newsom vetoes bill SB 1047 that aims to prevent AI disasters

California Gov. Gavin Newsom has vetoed bill SB 1047, which aims to prevent bad actors from using AI to cause "critical harm" to humans. The California state assembly passed the legislation by a margin of 41-9 on August 28, but several organizations including the Chamber of Commerce had urged Newsom to veto the bill . In his veto message on Sept. 29, Newsom said the bill is "well-intentioned" but "does not take into account whether an Al system is deployed in high-risk environments, involves critical decision-making or the use of sensitive data. Instead, the bill applies stringent standards to even the most basic functions - so long as a large system deploys it."  SB 1047 would have made the developers of AI models liable for adopting safety protocols that would stop catastrophic uses of their technology. That includes preventive measures such as testing and outside risk assessment, as well as an "emergency stop" that would completely shut down...