Skip to main content

Oracle’s top four execs didn’t get their latest $21 million chunk of performance-based stock options for a very telling reason (ORCL)

Larry Ellison and Safra Catz

  • Because Oracle did not hit certain goals related to its cloud computing business, none of its top four executives have earned a chunk of the massive block of stock options they were granted last year, Oracle said.
  • Not yet, anyway.
  • But they will still be paid millions in stock compensation from their previous grants.
  • And a compensation expert explains how the board could still pay them more.


Oracle has been telling investors that because it did not hit certain goals related to its cloud computing business, none of its top four executives earned any chunk of the massive block of stock options they were granted last year.

Not yet, anyway.

And, it's worth pointing out, they were all still paid millions in stock compensation last year from their previous grants, so they're likely not hurting for cash.

However, in a shareholder presentation, Oracle said: "No goals were satisfied in year 1 (fiscal 2018) and therefore no portion of the Performance Options have vested to date," with the emphasis added by Oracle. 

To parse that out: last year, Oracle said it changed the way it will pay its four top execs for the next five fiscal years. Oracle's fiscal year ends May 31.

Instead of its usual annual grant of stock options, Oracle gave co-CEOs Mark Hurd and Safra Catz, as well as executive chairman Larry Ellison,  an enormous up-front mega-grant worth $103.7 million apiece, payable in seven equal chunks over five years. 

The fourth exec, Thomas Kurian, the man in charge of Oracle's all-important cloud computing efforts, got a similar up-front grant of $69.38 million.

While that sounds like a lot of money for each of those (and it is), the board has been trying to make the case that it's actually a pay cut from previous pay packages these execs have been awarded. And, Oracle notes, the packages come with some catches.

The grant was divided into seven equal portions. One chunk would be instantly payable if the company hit a stock price of $80/share for at least 30 days. That didn't happen last year. Oracle shares topped out at about $53, which is still at a 10-year high, but not the sky-high valuation the board was looking for. 

The other six tranches had both a market cap goal and a business goal tied to Oracle's cloud business. Both goals must be met for the executives to get the options. Each tranche is worth $20.74 million for the two CEOs and Ellison, the company said.

The easiest tranche involves boosting the company's market cap by $16.7 billion, above a baseline of $207 billion.  The highest goal was to get the company's market cap up $100 billion over the same baseline.

The business goals were all about the cloud, including: Revenue targets of $20 billion of total cloud revenue; $10 billion for its software cloud business (where companies pay monthly for Oracle cloud software) and $10 billion for its other cloud businesses (where companies run their own software on Oracle's data centers). The board set certain profit margin goals for the cloud business, too.

The ultimate business goal for these executives to unlock their final tranche is "becoming the largest SaaS enterprise company." That's been a big promise the top execs have been making for years, and it's not clear how the board plans to measure that.

In any case, Oracle can't claim it has achieved this goal. And so, these executives miss their biggest payday.

As of the third quarter of last year, Oracle's total cloud revenues were just under $4.6 billion. In the fourth quarter, Oracle changed its reporting practices to hide its cloud revenues, blending the cloud business results with its traditional software business.

So we can only make an educated guess what its total revenues are. If its fourth quarter revenue had similar growth to the third, 32%, it would have ended the year with about $6.6 billion in cloud revenue.

That's nothing to sneeze at, to be sure. For comparison's sake, though, Oracle's archrival Salesforce ended its year at over $10 billion in revenue. Microsoft is also crushing it on cloud. Its commercial cloud sales brought in $6.9 billion last quarter alone, although Microsoft also does not disclose revenue from specific cloud products.

And here's a caveat: the Oracle executives haven't lost out any of these millions of stock-options yet. They won't forfeit any unless the full five years goes by without hitting all of those targets. 

And maybe not even then. While the board says that it doesn't plan on giving these execs any more grants of stock options for the five-year period, compensation expert Rosanna Landis-Weaver of shareholder advocacy group As You Sow points out that this promise "is not legally binding." 

Should these execs really be at risk of not getting their stock pay, the board "could still do more grants. They just have to have an explanation for why they did it," she says. Which is to say, 

Meanwhile, all of them still paid got an armload lot of stock options and stock grants in the year from previous grants made in 2015 and 2016. We'll find the details when Oracle files its next shareholder's proxy statement.

SEE ALSO: There's a very good reason why Cisco shelled out $2.35 billion to buy hot startup Duo Security

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Why the World Cup soccer ball looks so different



from Tech Insider https://ift.tt/2MecZuZ
via IFTTT

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Instagram accidentally reinstated Pornhub’s banned account

After years of on-and-off temporary suspensions, Instagram permanently banned Pornhub’s account in September. Then, for a short period of time this weekend, the account was reinstated. By Tuesday, it was permanently banned again. “This was done in error,” an Instagram spokesperson told TechCrunch. “As we’ve said previously, we permanently disabled this Instagram account for repeatedly violating our policies.” Instagram’s content guidelines prohibit  nudity and sexual solicitation . A Pornhub spokesperson told TechCrunch, though, that they believe the adult streaming platform’s account did not violate any guidelines. Instagram has not commented on the exact reasoning for the ban, or which policies the account violated. It’s worrying from a moderation perspective if a permanently banned Instagram account can accidentally get switched back on. Pornhub told TechCrunch that its account even received a notice from Instagram, stating that its ban had been a mistake (that message itself w

Colorado police identified the serial killer who murdered 4 women 40 years ago after exhuming his body to analyze a DNA sample

A scientist examines computer images of DNA models. Getty Images Police in Colorado have cracked the cold cases of four women killed 40 years ago. Denver PD said genetic genealogy and DNA analysis helped them identify the serial killer. He had died by suicide in jail in 1981. DNA from his exhumed body matched evidence from the murders. Police in Colorado have cracked the code on four murder cases that went unsolved for 40 years, using DNA from the killer's exhumed body. The cases pertain to four women killed in the Denver metro area between 1978 and 1981. They were 33-year-old Madeleine Furey-Livaudais, 53-year-old Dolores Barajas, 27-year-old Gwendolyn Harris, and 17-year-old Antoinette Parks. The four women were stabbed to death. Denver Police Commander Matt Clark said in a press conference Friday that there was an "underlying sexual component" to the murders but didn't elaborate further. In 2009, a detective reviewed Parks' case and picked several p

Axeleo Capital raises $51 million fund

Axeleo Capital has raised a $51 million fund (€45 million). Axeleo first started with an accelerator focused on enterprise startups. The firm is now all grown up with an acceleration program and a full-fledged VC fund. The accelerator is now called Axeleo Scale , while the fund is called Axeleo Capital . And it’s important to mention both parts of the business as they work hand in hand. Axeleo picks up around 10 startups per year and help them reach the Series A stage. If they’re doing well over the 12 to 18 months of the program, Axeleo funds those startups using its VC fund. Limited partners behind the company’s first fund include Bpifrance through the French Tech Accélération program, the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes region, Vinci Energies, Crédit Agricole, BNP Paribas, Caisse d’Épargne Rhône-Alpes as well as various business angels and family offices. The firm is also partnering with Hi Inov, the holding company of the Dentressangle family. Axeleo will take care of the early stage in